Mark Haisma Gevrey Chambertin En Pallud

A refined and site-specific Gevrey-Chambertin from En Pallud, offering a more elegant and floral expression of the village.

Review this wine
Regular price
$181
Regular price
Sale price
$181
Tax included.

Region : Burgundy, France

Product Type : Pinot Noir

Vintage: 2022
Secure Checkout trust badge - Curated Wines

Mark Haisma Gevrey-Chambertin En Pallud is a site-specific Gevrey that runs a shade more brooding, with ripe dark fruit, savoury minerality and a confident line of tannin.

The winemaking is tuned for balanceextraction is paced to keep structure refined, and élevage with measured oak influence knits the palate and amplifies complexity without masking the vineyard voice.

Mark generally favours fruit from growers who work thoughtfully in the vines, reflecting a preference for healthier soils and a more sustainable, minimal-intervention result.

Haisma's story is one of deliberate focus: an Australian who built credibility in Burgundy through long-term relationships, translating small parcels into wines that are precise, expressive and true to their origins.

Want to know more about this wine? Check out the tasting notes and wine attributes

Wine details
▾

13.5% ABV - 750 ml - Gevrey-Chambertin, Burgundy, France

Sustainability
▾

Fruit from the En Pallud vineyard, located near the Grand Crus; farmed with minimal intervention to highlight the site's unique elegance.

Tasting notes
▾

Lifted aromas of red cherries are layered with notes of violets and rose petals. The palate is medium-bodied and surprisingly silky for Gevrey, with fine tannins and a vibrant acidity. The fruit is pure and bright, leading to a long, graceful finish with a subtle mineral undertone.

Serving temperature
▾

Serve at 15-17 °C

Food pairings
▾

Pairs well with roasted pheasant or duck confit. For an Asian match, try it with Cantonese roast duck, Japanese Wagyu beef (salt-grilled), or Singaporean soy sauce chicken.

More questions about ordering, delivery or wine? See our FAQ →

See something above that needs correcting? Let us know.